This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
IndiaPost LiveIndiaPost LiveIndiaPost Live
  • Home
  • India
  • World
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • English
  • हिन्दी
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
IndiaPost LiveIndiaPost Live
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • India
  • World
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • English
  • हिन्दी
  • India News
  • State
  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Trending
  • Sports
  • Career
  • Lifestyle
  • हिन्दी
Follow US
© 2024 NM Media. All Rights Reserved.
Home » SC dismisses plea seeking withdrawal of Z+ security cover to Mukesh Ambani, his family; warns petitioner
India News

SC dismisses plea seeking withdrawal of Z+ security cover to Mukesh Ambani, his family; warns petitioner

NM Desk
Last updated: 13 June, 2025 3:38 PM
NM Desk
Share
SC dismisses plea seeking withdrawal of Z+ security cover to Mukesh Ambani, his family; warns petitioner
SC dismisses plea seeking withdrawal of Z+ security cover to Mukesh Ambani, his family; warns petitioner

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday (June 13) dismissed an application seeking withdrawal of Z+ security cover to businessman Mukesh Ambani and his family and warned the petitioner of imposing cost on him if he indulged in similar exercise in future.

A bench comprising Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice Manmohan, while dismissing the application by one Bikash Saha, reaffirmed its earlier order to provide Z+ security cover to the Ambanis and said that the petitioner has no locus standi to challenge the security cover provided to Mukesh Ambani and his family members by the State after duly evaluating the threat inputs.

The bench noted that the apex court earlier also said that applicant Saha had no locus standi to challenge the security cover provided to the Ambanis and rejected his pleas twice, yet he has filed a similar plea, which is not only frivolous but also vexatious.

Read More

‘Your input valuable’: Sitharaman after X user requests ‘relief’ for middle-class
Digital outcry prompts FM Nirmala Sitharaman’s reply over GST registration issue
2 unclaimed boxes found near residences of CM Mamata Banerjee and Abhishek Banerjee
Mamata Banerjee sets target of over 215 seats in 2026 Bengal assembly polls
PM Modi to visit earthquake-hit Bangkok to attend 6th BIMSTEC Summit
Act East in action: Modi’s diplomacy boosts India’s strategic, trade and cultural ties with ASEAN

“We will again reiterate the petitioner (Saha) has no locus seeking prayer to withdraw security cover granted by the Union of India and State of Maharashtra to the respondents. The petitioner has not produced any material that there is any significant change in the security perception. We refuse to entertain this application, observing that Z plus security cover offered to the respondents will continued to be given. We warn the petitioner to not to indulge in similar exercise in future, failing which this court shall consider imposing exemplary cost,” the bench said, Livelaw reported.

Saha, who sought periodic reassessment of the security threat to the Ambanis, filed the present application in an appeal filed by the Centre against the interim directions of the Tripura High Court directing for production of files of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) relating to the security cover given to Mukesh Ambani and his family.

The High Court passed two interim orders on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Saha and had earlier directed the Centre to place before it the original file maintained by the MHA regarding threat perception and assessment report of the Ambanis on the basis of which security was granted to them.

The Supreme Court later stayed the High Court order after the Centre challenged the High Court order and later in an order passed in February 2022, the apex court directed the Centre to provide Z+ security cover to Mukesh Ambani and his family across the country as well as abroad and said that cost for providing security is to be borne by Ambanis.

You Might Also Like

‘How’s the Josh?’: Soren’s JMM posts as INDIA bloc chases, surpasses NDA numbers in Jharkhand

Manipur’s crisis dates back seven decades, began during Congress era: Himanta Biswa Sarma at WITT 2025

Jharkhand gears up for first phase voting: Adivasi vote holds key in tight race

Aviation department initiated probe, official death toll only after DNA test: Amit Shah on Air India plane crash

Lake formation in desert? What exactly happened in Jaisalmer’s Mohangarh | Explained

TAGGED:Mukesh AmbaniMukesh Ambani familySecurity coverSecurity cover to Mukesh Ambani and his familySupreme CourtTripura High Court
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp Telegram Copy Link

Latest News

India’s Energy Cushion Is Holding But the Real Test Lies Ahead
India News
प्राचीन भारत के गौरवशाली ब्राह्मण राजवंश: शुंग से वाकाटक तक का सफर
General Knowledge
Singer Jasmeen Akhtar drops her latest single Malak Dyaal
Entertainment
Indie Artist Prabhanjan Unveils First Look of His Upcoming Afro-Desi Single ‘Thugwa’
Entertainment

You also Like

Groom dies of heart attack while riding horse during wedding procession in MP
India News

Groom dies of heart attack while riding horse during wedding procession in MP

NM Desk NM Desk 3 Min Read
Dehradun road accident: 3-membered committee to examine growing number of accidents
India News

Dehradun road accident: 3-membered committee to examine growing number of accidents

NM Desk NM Desk 3 Min Read
After Maharashtra win, Ajit Pawar eyes Delhi polls to regain NCP’s national party tag
India News

After Maharashtra win, Ajit Pawar eyes Delhi polls to regain NCP’s national party tag

NM Desk NM Desk 2 Min Read
IndiaPost LiveIndiaPost Live
Follow US
© 2024 NM Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account