This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
IndiaPost LiveIndiaPost LiveIndiaPost Live
  • Home
  • India
  • World
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
IndiaPost LiveIndiaPost Live
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • India
  • World
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • India News
  • State
  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Trending
  • Sports
  • Career
  • Lifestyle
  • Languages
Follow US
© 2024 NM Media. All Rights Reserved.

News » India News » Explained: What is the Places of Worship Act and why is it being challenged?

India News

Explained: What is the Places of Worship Act and why is it being challenged?

NM Desk
Last updated: 12 December, 2024 11:35 AM
NM Desk
Share
Gyanvapi row: Court rejects Hindu side plea for repair work at basement of Vyas Ji

New Delhi: The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, brought in by the Congress government under then prime minister PV Narasimha Rao, mandates that the religious character of places of worship as of August 15, 1947, must stay unchanged. It prohibits filing of a lawsuit to reclaim a place of worship or seek a change in its character from what existed on August 15, 1947.

Contents
Different Sections of the ActWhy has the law drawn flak in recent times

However, the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi site was exempted from the Act, which allowed the trial in the Ayodhya case to continue even after the law was enforced. The Act also exempts any place of worship that is an ancient or historical monument, or an archaeological site protected under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958. It also exempted any dispute that has been settled by the parties or conversion of any place that took place mutual agreement before the Act commenced.

Different Sections of the Act

Section 3 of the Act prohibits the conversion, either fully or partially, of a place of worship from one religious denomination to another, or even to a different segment within the same religious denomination.

Read More

Earth Under Threat! Asteroid 2019 UH14’s Terrifying Close Call with Earth!
Earth Under Threat! Asteroid 2019 UH14’s Terrifying Close Call with Earth!
Ilia Topuria shocks fans with historic knockout victory over Max Holloway
Ilia Topuria shocks fans with historic knockout victory over Max Holloway
Kotak Mahindra Bank customers take note: Rate cut for Savings account
Kotak Mahindra Bank customers take note: Rate cut for Savings account

Section 4(1) points out that the religious character of a place of worship “shall continue to be the same as it existed” on August 15 1947.

Section 4(2) says that any lawsuit or legal proceeding regarding the conversion of the religious character of any place of worship existing on August 15, 1947, pending before any court, shall abate and no fresh suit or legal proceedings shall be instituted.

Section 5 underlines that nothing contained in this Act shall apply to the place or place of worship commonly known as Ram Janma Bhumi-Babri Masjid situated in Ayodhya in Uttar Pradesh and to any suit, appeal or other proceeding relating to the said place or place of worship.

Section 6 spells out the punishment for flouting the law. It says whoever contravenes the provisions of Section 3 shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.

Why has the law drawn flak in recent times

In recent times, the law has faced criticism from different quarters and been challenged on the grounds that it bars judicial review, which is the essence of the Constitution. The detractors also claim that the Act imposes an “arbitrary and irrational” retrospective cutoff date, and encroaches upon the religious rights of Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court is set to hear a batch of PILs challenging the validity of certain provisions of a 1991 law. The PILs come against the backdrop of several lawsuits filed in various courts, including those related to the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi, Shahi Idgah Mosque in Mathura, and Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal. The petitioners claim that these were constructed after razing ancient temples. The various pleas seek court nod to allow the Hindus to offer prayers there. From Qutub Minar to Bhojshala and Ajmer Sharif, in the past 4 years, nine temple-mosque disputes have reportedly reached the court.

You Might Also Like

Woman tourist from Pune, instructor die after paraglider crashes into ravine in Goa

CM Dhami requests PM Modi to operate all trains from Rishikesh’s Yoga Nagari station

Pahalgam terror attack: Security agencies release sketches of three suspects

Mumbai under Yellow Alert; When will it stop raining? Check IMD’s weekly forecast

Yuvraj Maharaj Aryaman Scindia, chairman of MPCL Governing Council, attends player draft event in Indore

TAGGED:45Ayodhya disputeBabri MasjidGyanvapi MosqueJudicial ReviewPlaces of Worship Act 1991Ram JanmabhoomiReligious freedomSection 3Shahi Idgah MosqueTemple-Mosque Disputes
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp Telegram Copy Link

Latest News

Patanjali’s Ayurvedic medicine found effective for heart health, study reveals
Patanjali’s Ayurvedic medicine found effective for heart health, study reveals
India News
Punjab education minister holds dialogue with Sangrur teachers, announces Rs 400 crore revamp of computer labs
Punjab education minister holds dialogue with Sangrur teachers, announces Rs 400 crore revamp of computer labs
India News
JD(U) leader Mohammed Qasim Ansari quits party over Waqf Bill, Rajiv Ranjan Prasad dismisses him as ‘non-entity’
Bihar launches renewable energy and storage policies, inks MoUs worth over Rs 5,000 crore
India News
Rajasthan school roof collapse: Seven dead, political fallout ensues
Rajasthan school roof collapse: Seven dead, political fallout ensues
India News

You also Like

RG Kar case: Supreme Court orders removal of victim’s identity from social media
India News

RG Kar case: Supreme Court orders removal of victim’s identity from social media

NM Desk NM Desk 2 Min Read
EAM Jaishankar to represent India at Donald Trump’s swearing-in as 47th US President
India News

S Jaishankar expresses alarm over alleged US funding for Indian election influence

NM Desk NM Desk 3 Min Read
Man United vs Chelsea LIVE SCORE: Chelsea travel to Old Trafford to bounce back
India News

Man United vs Chelsea LIVE SCORE: Chelsea travel to Old Trafford to bounce back

NM Desk NM Desk 2 Min Read
IndiaPost LiveIndiaPost Live
Follow US
© 2024 NM Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account