<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Imran Pratapgarhi &#8211; IndiaPost Live</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.indiapostlive.com/topic/imran-pratapgarhi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.indiapostlive.com</link>
	<description>Read Latest News here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:03:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">225307897</site>	<item>
		<title>Who said what? Congress, Owaisi, AAP on Supreme court Waqf hearing</title>
		<link>https://www.indiapostlive.com/india-news/who-said-what-congress-owaisi-aap-on-supreme-court-waqf-hearing/50513/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NM Desk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[India News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amanatullah Khan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asaduddin Owaisi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imran Pratapgarhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vishnu Shankar Jain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waqf Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waqf Amendment Act 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waqf properties]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.indiapostlive.com/india-news/who-said-what-congress-owaisi-aap-on-supreme-court-waqf-hearing/50513/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New Delhi: AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi has strongly opposed the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, calling it &#8220;unconstitutional&#8221; in response to the ongoing Supreme Court hearings. Taking to the media, Owaisi stated, &#8220;I was a member of the Joint Working Committee of Parliament and submitted a dissenting report opposing all amendments proposed by the government. I [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">50513</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why am I only seen as a Muslim face and not as a youth leader?: Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi at WITT 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.indiapostlive.com/india-news/why-i-only-see-as-a-muslim-face-and-not-as-a-young-leader-congress-mp-imran-pratapgarhi-at-white-2025/49615/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NM Desk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[India News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imran Pratapgarhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahul Gandhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WITT 2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.indiapostlive.com/india-news/why-am-i-only-seen-as-a-muslim-face-and-not-as-a-youth-leader-congress-mp-imran-pratapgarhi-at-witt-2025/49615/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New Delhi: Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi on Saturday raised concerns over being labelled solely as a “Muslim face” in politics, adding that he represents Congress as a youth leader rather than being confined to a religious identity. Speaking at the third edition of TV9 Network’s What India Thinks Today Global Summit 2025, he criticised both [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">49615</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC reserves verdict on Pratapgarhi’s plea for quashing FIR over poem on social media</title>
		<link>https://www.indiapostlive.com/india-news/sc-reserves-verdict-on-pratapgarhis-plea-for-quashing-fir-over-poem-on-social-media/48724/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NM Desk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 10:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[India News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imran Pratapgarhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Provocative song]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.indiapostlive.com/india-news/sc-reserves-verdict-on-pratapgarhis-plea-for-quashing-fir-over-poem-on-social-media/48724/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday (March 3), while reserving its verdict on a plea by Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi seeking to quash an FIR against him for allegedly sharing a provocative song, said that the freedom of speech and expression had to be at least now understood by the police after 75 years [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">48724</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC questions FIR against Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi over poem on social media</title>
		<link>https://www.indiapostlive.com/india-news/sc-questions-fir-against-congress-mp-imran-pratapgarhi-over-poem-on-social-media/46931/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NM Desk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[India News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imran Pratapgarhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Provocative song]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.indiapostlive.com/india-news/sc-questions-fir-against-congress-mp-imran-pratapgarhi-over-poem-on-social-media/46931/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday (February 10) questioned a First Information Report (FIR) registered by the Gujarat Police against Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi for allegedly posting an edited video of a provocative poem on social media. A bench comprising Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan was hearing an appeal filed by [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">46931</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC stays proceedings against Congress MP Pratapgarhi in FIR over social media post</title>
		<link>https://www.indiapostlive.com/india-news/sc-stays-proceedings-against-congress-mp-pratapgarhi-in-fir-over-social-media-post/44746/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NM Desk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[India News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imran Pratapgarhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Provocative song]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.indiapostlive.com/india-news/sc-stays-proceedings-against-congress-mp-pratapgarhi-in-fir-over-social-media-post/44746/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday (January 21) stayed proceedings in a case registered against Congress Member of Parliament (MP) Imran Pratapgarhi for allegedly posting an edited video of a provocative song on social media. A bench comprising Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan stayed proceedings while hearing an appeal filed by [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">44746</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
